Recently I ran across a book defending the financial system,
Smart Money, by Andrew Palmer.
The author says that since the recent financial crisis and bailouts, the
system as a whole has been demonized to an extent that people no longer
appreciate its benefits to society.
There was mismanagement and criminal activity, but that is no reason to
give up on new innovations or demand regulations that turn the clock back to
simpler times.
One particular example is high-frequency trading that took
off in the mid-2000s. This use of
high-speed computing to execute trades in the market has led to a number of bad
practices, where those traders are able to take advantage of price swings and
manipulate the market in various ways.
He asserts that the publicity received by instances of manipulation
exaggerate the real size of the problems (understandable when I consider
similar reporting of rare airline crashes).
He claims that the advantage of speed merely replaces the former
advantage of monopolistic privileges of having a place on the trading floor,
where similar manipulation was known to have happened. HFT leads to more efficiency and lower
transaction costs, and the “HFT era arose...in part because of concerns about
how the old system worked.”
So what’s the big deal and what does this have to do with
behavior? The biggest problem with HFT
is “that the unchecked logic of
competition has increased the risk and potential severity of sudden market
crashes.” [Emphasis added.] A company can go out of business in a matter
of minutes. The economy, the one we depend
on for our livelihood and the goods and services we need, could receive a major
shock in a matter of hours! The speed of
these automatic transactions, faster than the ability of humans to intervene
when things go out of control, is very dangerous. It calls for regulation and responsibility.
Now see the parallel with behavior. The types of innovations that drive the
financial industry are not unlike those that affect our daily lives. Many people have smart phones; most have cell
phones. The Internet is a common
platform for personal financial transactions and simple shopping. A billion people on Facebook, and how do they
make their money? – Advertising and selling consumer information gleaned from
the massive amounts of stored data.
We go on line to see news, which now at 24 hours is filled
with fluff and repetition. We gather
information on fashions, hobbies and view the latest postings of cute babies or
clever animals. (On average teens spend more time on their devices than sleeping.) While we do, we are
exposed to hundreds of times the advertising compared to a generation ago and
hundreds of times the misinformation, some of it harmless enough, but much of
it full of bad health advice, unproven nutritional advice, advocacy of
feel-good but illogical policies featuring skewed economic understanding, along
with the usual divisive political partisanship depending on accusations and
name-calling (rather than facts or logic) to promote positions. Social media is filled with opinions: those we agree with we take as fact; those we
disagree with are seen as insults. Among
all this chatter, we must deal with threats like identity theft and phishing
that were unheard of a generation ago.
Here we sit, with the same critical thinking (some would
argue worse based on America’s educational decline), the same economic understanding,
perspective, sense of responsibility (some would argue worse based on the
current trends in narcissism and victimhood), and discipline (some would argue much
worse based on the obesity epidemic and personal savings crisis). Here we sit, expecting to get by and strive
in the high-tech, high-speed twenty-first century clinging to the belief that
the behavior and skill levels of the past will see us through. Instead of getting more demanding, we have in
fact become more tolerant of lax behaviors in many of these areas, defending
weaknesses instead of motivating for change, defending failed government
programs that make people more dependent, squandering our money on luxuries and
expecting someone else to bail us out at retirement.
The potential dangers of high-speeds in finance offer an
important lesson about the real potential dangers of the high-speed society we
live in. The regulation to avoid
disaster in the first instance comes from government and everyone will cry out
for it. Regulation to avoid disaster in
the second can only come internally and there is nary a peep.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment