It seems unfair, almost unethical, but when the media have good
pictures of an event, it makes the news – possibly pushing more important stories
out. Even when there aren’t pictures but
they want to report it, they manufacture pictures apparently just to keep us
from dozing off. It happens nationally
and locally.
It struck me again this week as I watched a local broadcast
about a murder investigation of two young teenage girls that has received
national attention. They took us to the
small town where it happened to watch a reporter stand out on a street in front
of the camera for a couple of minutes, reading from her smartphone that the
reward is growing and the number of tips has increased. Nothing else was happening, no one else in the picture.
I’m glad the police and FBI are still working hard on the
case. Overall though, this was not very
useful information. A higher number of
tips does not necessarily mean any of them are good tips, and a volume of
thousands might just bog down the investigation. And if someone knew something substantive, I
hope they are not waiting around for the reward to grow before coming
forward. The report was a good way to spread
public awareness, but why must someone be standing outside in the weather to
tell us about it? Are we incapable of
paying attention unless we get an on-the-spot report? Are they just trying to get some use out of
their expensive equipment?
I thought this was only a pet peeve of mine, but a number of
years ago I had an interesting experience.
Playing indoor soccer in a non-competitive co-ed league, I caught an
elbow in the nose and was bleeding impressively. The game stopped and both teams gathered to make
sure I was OK. As I lay on the bench
with a towel on my nose, some of the players from both teams soon began to give
me a hard time. One player, a local policeman, suggested that they drive me to the next city down the highway and drop me by
the side of the road because, according to him, the cops in that city take
really good care of injured people – ha, ha, ha. I warned that they had better not because
after it was all over Becky, a local news reporter who played on the other
team, would be sent down to stand in the dark and report, “Something happened
here a couple of hours ago.” I heard her reply,
“Do other people think that’s stupid, too?”
So I’m guessing, from my sample size of one, that the
reporters who are required to stand outside in all kinds of weather pointing to
the spot in the road where the crash happened or to the house where the drug
bust took place earlier as we see close-up shots of the street sign are just
following orders, paying their dues, standing out in the heat or cold or rain
or snow, until they earn a spot behind the desk. It’s a kind of initiation. For the viewers, it’s just a gimmick to keep
us “engaged,” as the kindergarten teachers would say. But don’t we get a little tired of being
treated like kindergarteners by the news, or is it just my (and a few others’)
pet peeve?
Remember, we get the quality of news we deserve. We get the quality of government we
deserve. They act the way they do in
response to our behavior. The America we
get is simply the sum of consequences good and bad resulting from individual
choices and those of our neighbors whether we encourage or acquiesce to them.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment