If I’ve said it once, I’ve said it a hundred times. In fact I probably have said it one hundred
times, because out of about 630 little essays here, this is the 107th
that refers to the subject of responsibility; specifically, when you don’t
exercise responsibility, you give up some of your freedom because someone is
always eager to step in and take over the job for you.
In many cases the helper, the one seeing to it that your
careless actions don’t hurt you or someone else, is the government. In those case the irresponsible actions of a
few result either in an additional cost to everyone, an additional restriction
on everyone’s actions or both. In the
latest case it is probably just a minor cost, but the example is revealing.
It seems a few people buckle their children into the child
safety seat in the back seat of the car on a hot day, drive to their
destination and walk away, forgetting the child is locked in a potentially
dangerous car. According to Reuters this
has resulted in 800 accidental deaths since 1990. Now that’s a long period of time, but small
steps may save the lives of about 40 children a year. (It has happened 9 times already this year
and the summer temperatures are just beginning in many parts of the country.)
In response, three lawmakers in Washington have proposed a
new regulation requiring that automakers install “devices to remind drivers to
check their back seats for passengers before getting out.” Safety experts agree and General Motors will
already include this feature in a few high-end 2018 models. This should not be much of a challenge or a
cost. It requires a bell or a light on
the dashboard as a check-the-back-seat reminder when the car is turned off. It should be easy as there are so many lights
and bells in cars today warning of open doors, unfastened seatbelts, front
airbags, etc.
One concern would be whether such a system would be easy to
grow accustomed to and ignore, although some might find it helpful to remind
them of a briefcase riding in the back seat.
Also, unless all the cars were recalled, it would take about 20 years to
be universally installed and in that time we could lose hundreds more children.
Of course, true to the new American mythology of an excuse for
everything, we are assured that it’s not really our fault. We are too stressed out. From Consumers Union: “Dr. David Diamond, the director of the
Neuroscience Collaborative Program and Center for Preclinical and Clinical
Research on PTSD at the University of South Florida, noted that competing brain
functions can cause a parent to lose awareness that their child is in the
car.” He blames the negligent acts on
“flaws in the brain.”
The cost is unknown.
Congress rarely thinks about these small costs when imposing more
regulations. But if this simple fix
costs less than five dollars per car, then based on annual sales of about 10
million vehicles with back seats (16 million minus some pickups and sports
cars), the total cost would be under $50 million, less than or about $1.25
million for each child saved. This would be reasonable, based on the assumption that no one ever knowingly leaves a kid in the carseat to run a quick errand.
But that’s $50 million per year not available to spend on
other things – there’s always a trade off.
What would we rather spend that money on if a few people didn’t have
this "brain flaw" that interfered with their behavior as responsible parents?
The final concern is that when this is successful in saving
a few lives, Washington will continue to feel duty bound to take on more of our
irresponsible behavior with costs and restrictions, like this suggestion by a professor
at the Boston University School of Medicine.
She believes sugary drinks should be regulated similarly to alcohol. “We regulate alcohol… We do not sell alcohol
to children. We tax it and you can’t drink while you
are working.”
Some fail in the
dimension of responsibility and we all lose.
Little by little we pay more and we give up our freedom.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment