How are we affected by the news? Do we just sit and watch, absorb the
information and form our own opinions?
The news media hopes this is not the case. They hope to influence our thinking, and there is some evidence that they are correct.
An older study about the donation habits of Americans is the
first example. This is quoted from the summary. “Using Internet donations after
the 2004 tsunami as a case study, we show that media coverage of disasters has
a dramatic impact on donations to relief agencies, with an additional minute of
nightly news coverage increasing donations by...13.2% of the average daily donation for the typical relief agency.
Similarly, an additional 700-word story in the New York Times or Wall Street
Journal raises donations by 18.2% of the daily average.” At that time social media was far less prevalent. It is a good bet that Twitter and Facebook has more influence today, possibly even more than the big newspapers.
Another example is parents’ heightened fear of abduction
leading them to be worried and overly protective. It began with pictures of missing kids on
milk cartons years ago, making it appear that a relatively rare problem was
widespread. They see reports that almost 466,000 children were
reported missing in 2016, not realizing that the category of “missing”
includes: runaway or abandoned, abducted
by a family member, miscommunication, premature
reporting, or abducted by a stranger.
The greatest concern is the last case, which is by far the least
frequent, amounting to less than 2% according to one source or a fraction
of 1% (100 per year) according to another.
When you consider that 466,000 represents only 0.6% of all children in
the US, these incidents are extremely rare.
The large number of 466,000 and the nation-wide publicity
blow the problem out of proportion, which helps sell news and raise donations for agencies dedicated to
this cause, but it causes parents to overcompensate. They restrict their children’s movements and
freedom far more than they did 50 or even 25 years ago. And if they don’t watch their kids every
second, busybody neighbors report them to protective services for being
negligent. At one point Rhode Island was
considering a bill that would prohibit children from getting off the school bus
in the afternoon if there wasn't an adult waiting to walk them home. This would
have applied until seventh grade.
Many people object to caged chickens as a cruelty but think
nothing of restricting children well beyond their abilities to cope – leading
to, among other problems, less independence and less learning.
On the news one day last week I heard a report about the
success of the Clean Air Act. It was similar to this on-line NPR report. “The Clean Air Act is a genuine American
success story and one of the most effective tools in U.S. history for
protecting public health. It has sharply reduced pollution from automobiles,
industrial smokestacks, utility plants, and major sources of toxic chemicals
and particulate matter since its passage in 1970. “ The story goes on to tell how it has saved
millions of lives and reduced emergency room visits.
The very next day on the same segment of the same news
program the headline was that air pollution causes premature deaths in the
elderly. “Even
short-term exposure to air pollution at levels that are below current air
quality standards appeared to increase the risk for death among older people.”
People hearing only the first report would be encouraged;
those hearing only the second would be discouraged; others hearing both might not know what to think.
Finally, an enlightening report tells that police officers killed in
the line of duty in 2017 approached a 50-year low. The graph accompanying the original article makes
the trend clear. But with wall-to-wall coverage of every incident, most citizens would think the opposite is true. Likewise and regardless of what politician and media reporting imply, the violent crime rate in the US is at the lowest point since 1990.
What makes good news is what makes good theater. It’s too bad this may lead to donations to
disasters or causes out of proportion to their seriousness and to fears out of
proportion to their dangers. The important question about the news is not whether it's true, but whether it's meant primarily to inform or to manipulate.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment