[“The federal government announced Wednesday it will eliminate a policy that allowed national parks like the Grand Canyon to ban the sale of bottled water in an effort to curb litter.” Fox News explains that the rules were set up in 2011 because empty bottles scattered throughout some of the parks had become a major problem. One problem was the emphasis on bottled water. They did not ban the sale of other beverages, such as sugary soft drinks that are typically made of sturdier plastic. The policy was obviously not completely thought through in the first place, setting them up as an easy target for objections.
Those objections did come and the National Park Service officials changed their minds. But instead of just admitting they were wrong or banning the rest of the soft drinks, they said they wanted to "expand hydration options for recreationalists, hikers, and other visitors to national parks." Falling back on the idea of hydration they tried to make it sound like a health-related decision. There are a couple of questionable aspects to this.
Later in the article is one sentence that probably gets more toward the truth: “ The bottled water and beverage industry have previously lobbied aggressively to keep bottled water at U.S. national parks.” As in most cases, follow the money.
But what is all this about hydration? This is one of those urban myths that people just won’t drop. I even heard someone talking about pre-hydration the other day, comparing drinking lots of water (or sports drink) to applying sunscreen before you go out.
More and more experts are coming forward with contrary, more balanced advice. Here is an example. “Drink when you're thirsty. Stop drinking when your thirst is quenched. Obey that one rule and there is no risk of dehydration,” says Dr. Stanley Goldfarb, a University of Pennsylvania kidney specialist.
Later on in that hydration article is a statement that shouldn’t surprise anyone: “Much research on human hydration [is] funded in part by bottled water industry.”
Another study found “no connection between hydration and the performance of athletes.” It reiterates the sound, moderate advice to drink when thirsty. There is no need to go overboard or walk through life tethered to a water bottle.
The final point is about bottled water itself. I have elaborated on this subject in the past. With a few rare exceptions or in emergency situations, bottled water is typically no purer than tap water and sells at a hundred times the price. From time to time the bottled water companies are taken to task by some government agency for questionable practices or claims. Some merely use tap water from another location. Most recently a lawsuit cites Poland Spring Water for deceiving customers by “bottling common groundwater that doesn’t meet the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's definition of spring water.”
Lately I’ve noticed in some airports an absence of the usual drinking fountains outside restrooms. The only option is to buy the bottles from the vendors. Again, follow the money.
Yes, it is important to have water with you when hiking in a national park (or anywhere). It is smart (critical thinking) to buy a water bottle or canteen for the occasion and fill it at the tap or refill it at a drinking fountain. It is responsible not to throw bottles or any kind of litter around the trails or campgrounds. It shows perspective to understand that it’s unnecessary to pre-hydrate or take other extraordinary actions. Drink when you are thirsty; it’s as simple as that. So many of these problems can be easily solved by right behavior rather than by government regulations.]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment