How hard is it to find evidence of problematic behavior in one or more of the five dimensions or of institutionalized support for these habits? Surprisingly easy. There are days when I have to pick and choose among available topics.
Today I have an Associated Press article left over from 3 weeks ago presenting research that tells how hormones make it more difficult to keep weight off after dieting. The headline begins, “Not your fault!” This is right out of the poor discipline/poor responsibility playbook. It gives people the excuse that they can’t stick to their diet because of their hormones. Ironically the header above the article features six advertising links, five of which are for weight-loss products, programs or surgery – the easy answers that everyone looks for when faced with the hard work of getting back to and staying at the right weight. This is practically the definition of discipline and responsibility failures that bubble up into many other societal issues and crises (budgeting, smoking, and alcohol abuse, to name a few).
How, in the first place, can any reputable scientist say that hormones are the problem? Didn’t humans have the same hormones many years ago when the number of overweight Americans was less than half of what it is today? It just doesn’t add up.
Second, how can the parent of a teenager use hormones as an excuse for regaining weight and not let that teenager use hormones as an excuse for any of their own destructive decisions? This sounds like a can of worms ready to be opened.
I have sometimes jokingly said that if I ever got arrested for anything, I’d just tell the police that what I was doing was performance art and protected under the First Amendment. Now, I guess, if that doesn’t fly, I have the excuse of hormones to fall back on.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment