When you wake up in the morning and run to the bathroom, do
you ever stop to think how grateful you are for indoor plumbing? You don’t have to put on your boots and slog
through the mud to an outhouse or use a not-very sanitary pot stored under the
bed until it can be emptied outside.
Having a warm, dry and relatively clean bathroom nearby is something
that most of us are so used to that the thought of any other arrangement never crosses
our minds. It’s expected.
This occurred to me as I read a UN report, not on bathrooms,
but on the aging population. “By the
year 2050, for the first time in history, seniors older than 60 will outnumber
children younger than 15.” An elder
rights group, HelpAge International, co-sponsored the research. Their primary concern is that “most countries
are not prepared to support their swelling numbers of elderly people.” Like indoor plumbing, we don’t even question
this.
When did it become the responsibility of the governments to support older people? In the US it apparently was in 1935 when the government decided that people older than 65
should receive additional support in the form of Social Security. (It would be funded by other people by a tax on paychecks.) Later (1983) the full
retirement age changed to 66 and will slowly increase to 67. These changes were likely based on finances
and politics rather than some scientific or moral agreement that 66 or 67 was
the right age for older Americans to stop being totally responsible for their
own livelihood and to expect the government to take over.
The UN report recognizes that resources are not unlimited
and that without changes many governments have made promises that they soon
will no longer be able to keep. What
they don’t recognize is that the primary assumption that the government is
morally responsible for maintaining this older population is problematic. As everyone accepts it, this assumption takes
the pressure off citizens to plan for their own futures. They don’t have to save and can engage advocacy
groups to help them complain whenever there is a threat to their “rights.” This complacency is evident in common stories of elders who are totally dependent on Social Security and can't make ends meet when Medicare increases eat up cost-of-living adjustments.
One day it will be like getting out of bed and finding the
bathroom door nailed shut or a broken water main in the street. It will cause panic. If you don’t believe it, consider all the
minor panics that are taking place during the government shutdown or due to the
sequester. Temporary loss of free
daycare and National Parks, having work hours cut by 20%, or losing a paycheck
for a few weeks doesn’t compare to living 65 years and suddenly realizing you
should have put away some savings.
We have expectations. We have
rights. We don’t even question the
premise. If resources are limited, that’s
someone else’s problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment