A couple of months ago an Iowa man bought a small painting
at a garage sale for $15. He bought it
because he liked it. Something about the
color and composition appealed to him, and he thought it would look good in his
dining room. He found that his wife
agreed and he hung it on the wall. A few
weeks later one of his neighbors, a retired college professor, dropped by and
the painting caught his eye. He admired
it as well, but told the man that he should have it appraised because it might
be worth something. As it turned out, it was an original, previously unknown painting by American artist
Grant Wood. It’s estimated value was $40,000
to $60,000. He immediately drove to the
house where he bought it and told them the story. Neither he nor the sellers were aware of
its value, but he promised that if he ever sold it, he would split the money
with them. They agreed and will be very
happy to share in the windfall.
Notice there is no link to the above story, because I just
made it up. I have never heard of
something like that happening. In fact,
the story usually ends up with the buyer gloating over the fact that he picked
up a valuable piece of art for a small fraction of its value. There is never any talk of the poor suckers
who let it go for so little. Even if the
buyer, out of a sense of fair play, were inclined to offer to share the
windfall with the original owners, it wouldn’t surprise anyone to hear that the
original owners hired a lawyer to try to recover the painting instead of
graciously accepting the offer. Our
understanding of human nature and the values of our society lead us to accept
these versions more readily than the first story.
In fact, it’s more believable to think that the man at the
garage sale haggled with the sellers to get the price down or to get another
item thrown in for free. That’s the way
almost everyone acts at a garage sale.
That’s the way almost everyone acts at a car dealership or when
contracting for home repairs or buying a house.
We are always looking for the bargain.
Phone Aps tell us the best price for gasoline in the area. If we buy even a small item and it goes on
sale the next week, we feel cheated.
With rare exceptions we never want to pay more than we absolutely must.
Now we read editorial comments about how everyone deserves
to be paid a living wage. Fast food workers stage periodic strikes for $10 to $15 per hour wages to support their
families. Everyone assumes that the
corporate managers are the bad guys.
They are portrayed as evil and greedy for doing what the rest of us do
in our daily lives, trying to pay no more than the value received.
As pleas go out for a “living wage” and “fair pay,” a couple
of questions come to mind. First, were
these jobs ever intended for “a single mother with five children ranging in age
from 21 months to 18 years old” or a 33-year-old with “a one-year-old daughter
and a 12-year-old son” or another who “is the main source of income for his
family, which collects food stamps and takes government help to pay the
rent”? I thought these were starter jobs
to teach young people about dependability, responsibility and customer service, not career
opportunities. Second, how many of us
consider the financial hardships of the family hosting the garage sale or the
kinds of mistakes a car salesman or house painter may have made earlier in life
before we start haggling about the price?
No, we pay only what we think is fair for us or walk away.
When you think of the problem in terms of our American
culture and the habits of everyday people, the behavior of the fast-food corporate
management does not seem to be so evil or even so very unusual.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment