Is this stuff getting a little out of hand? Not too long ago I wrote about some folks who
were upset that pet pharmaceuticals are not held to the same testing and safety
standards as human drugs; and I pointed out that if those people got their
wishes, they and all the other pet owners would be paying far more for drugs
that take longer to get approval. That’s
just critical thinking and economic understanding.
Since then the pet lovers keep coming up with more ways to
surprise me. As I walked out of the
grocery store I saw a poster advertising all natural pet food. I saw this as another way to use trigger
words to lure shoppers into spending more than necessary for a false sense of making
a big difference. I went on line to
research it and found more examples: all natural treats, shampoo, odor remover and
toys for pets. It seems the marketing
game has gone far beyond food and supplies for humans.
Sticking with the food category, though, I found an ad
suggesting: “Feed your furry family member” a dry dog food formula featuring “tasty,
healthy ingredients in fun shapes and sizes to interest and delight your dog.” It contains “complete and balanced nutrition”
with “wholesome grains and vitamin-rich vegetables” to support “your dog’s
health and lifestyle in a variety of ways.”
Apparently dogs have “lifestyles” that needs to be supported, and they
need to be amused while eating. See how
they appeal to our nurturing instincts in order to charge us more for fancier
sounding products by rebranding pets as furry family members.
Unfortunately this is the same brand of pet food that is being sued for allegedly poisoning thousands of dogs. In addition to those healthy grains and
vitamins, litigators claim that it also contains “an ingredient toxic to
animals, propylene glycol,” which is blamed for the deaths of many dogs and
sickness of others.
But this is only the beginning. I easily found an item on pet plastic surgery. One procedure described is called Neuticles: “silicone implants are slipped in during the
time of neutering and replace the testicles that the veterinarians are
removing.” The dog looks like he’s still
ready for action, and the company claims “more than 500,000 pets have had them
implanted since they were put on the market in 1995.” (Is this another product to support the dog’s
lifestyle or just a way to keep the pooch from getting low self-esteem?) Other examples of plastic surgery include
nose jobs and facelifts, but these are mostly for health rather than cosmetic
purposes and are often the result of people not doing proper research before adopting a particular breed. But even the
writer seems to be surprised that pet owners would “shell out the $4,000 to
$5,000 needed for these surgeries” not for champion show dogs but for average
household pets.
Cats and dogs can also develop dental problems. Eighty-five percent of dogs have serious
periodontal disease that needs treatment.
Some need braces to correct biting problems. And 72 percent of cats get cavities known as
tooth resorptions. This too can get
expensive. Again it is done for health,
not cosmetic reasons; and animals have high pain threshold meaning that by the
time the owner becomes aware of the problem more drastic measures may be called
for.
People are drawn to the pictures of cute puppies and kittens
on the Internet. Replaying these
pictures and videos on the morning “news” programs is bound to elicit an “aw”
from the entire panel of presenters. It
seems like few people really recognize how much care these pets require and how
easily they can be lured into spending even more by clever advertising
reinforcing the part-of-the-family notion.
How many times does “cute” trump common sense decisions?
I don’t have pets myself – although I do have a couple of
“grandcats” – but I can understand the love people have for their pets. They are good companions and sometimes treat
you better than your human friends and family members, but from a perspective
point of view, this seems a little bit over the top. Fifty or sixty years ago pet owners were just as
fond of their dogs and cats, but seemed to be a little more down to earth about
how much they would be willing to spend on food, treats, toys, Christmas
presents and medical attention.
Under normal circumstances, having a pet is a luxury. By making them members of the family we have volunteered for even more expense and maintenance without fully realizing it. It always brings me back to the reality that millions of people have pets, but fewer have emergency savings or enough saved for their retirement.
Under normal circumstances, having a pet is a luxury. By making them members of the family we have volunteered for even more expense and maintenance without fully realizing it. It always brings me back to the reality that millions of people have pets, but fewer have emergency savings or enough saved for their retirement.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment