An ordinance requiring cellphone retailers to post an
advisory about potential radiation danger goes into effect next month in
Berkeley, California. It is called a
“Right to Know” measure, but some people feel it will do more harm than good.
New York Times science columnist John Tierney believes it
will needlessly increase the stress as well as “detract from more serious
warnings like those related to cigarette smoking.” With so many warnings, people have a tendency
to mentally throw up their hands in frustration and begin to ignore them all,
or worse, pick and choose which ones they want to believe.
What is the real danger that consumers have a right to know
about? According to the American Cancer Society, the radio frequency waves emitted by cell phones are not enough to
raise body temperature and do not cause DNA damage. There is no evidence in health records or
reports; in fact, “since cellphones were introduced, there has not been an
increase in brain cancer.” Several
independent, large studies in Denmark and Norway have confirmed that no such
harm comes from using cellphones.
Where people go wrong is not distinguishing between the
types of radiation. Cell phones produce
non-ionizing radiation which does not affect DNA. The National Cancer Institute states: “many studies have examined the potential
health effects of non-ionizing radiation from radar, microwave ovens, and other
sources, there is currently no consistent evidence that non-ionizing radiation
increases cancer risk."
When there is more of a risk from forgetting to put on
sunscreen, it seems a little crazy to be worrying about cellphone dangers, a
rumor that most of us thought was squelched many years ago. Some scare tactics never quite die, but they
cause problems only when some governing body buys into them and starts making
rules.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment