People have asked if I will ever run out of material for
this blog. Maybe someday I will be lucky
enough to find only examples of favorable behavior in the five dimensions and
it will get boring, but so far I’m still in business.
Last Thursday was a big day for responsibility, with two
examples in the news. The first
concerned a lawsuit over microwave popcorn and the second was about new data on
high school graduation rates for black males.
Responsibility is about taking control of your life,
recognizing your role in the consequences you face and not blaming another or
expect someone else to pay for your problems.
It often goes hand in hand with discipline. If I can’t stop smoking, I may want to call
it an addiction, blame the tobacco companies and make them pay me. If I am overweight, I may want to blame the
fast food restaurants for tricking me into eating a poor diet and get the
government to require extra labeling or warnings. Where there is no responsibility, problems
are not solved, because the only one who can solve them refuses to own them.
The first example is of a man who blames microwave
popcorn for his respiratory problems.
The resulting lawsuit promises him over $7 million in compensation (plus
a side settlement). Reading the article
we find that he ate 2 bags of microwave popcorn a day (over 20 times the average*)
for 10 years and sued the store selling it and the maker for not warning him of
the dangers. Microwave popcorn already
has seven or eight warnings on the side of the package. What’s one more? (For a humorous view of this Google “Pearls Before Swine” for September 23, 2012.)
When hearing a story like this, most people roll their eyes
and pass it off as yet another outrageous example of “jackpot justice” – out of
our control. Someone got hurt and found
a lawyer, a big company to blame and a sympathetic jury. The last line of the article reads, “CNBC
predicts the recent verdict will spark a rash of future lawsuits.” Who will be on those juries? Will they understand that lawsuits against
grocery stores (or even threats of them) will push up grocery prices for everyone? Will they consider that 14 bags of popcorn a
week might be a little extreme, not exactly the definition of moderation, and
that no company should be expected to account for every possible extraordinary behavior
by their customers? (You can overdose on
anything, even water!) Can we stop this
by expecting more responsibility from each other or do we condone it as members
of those juries?
The second article brings good news of an increased high
school graduation rate among black, male students, from 47% in 2008 to 52%, though
it’s still not high enough and continues to lag behind whites. The CEO of the Schott Foundation for Public
Education that conducted the study is quoted as saying, "These outcomes
are not evidence of flaws of young men, but evidence of willful neglect by
federal, state, local elected policymakers and leaders." The implication, of course, is that the low
rate is due to actions of others, not those of the students. But graduation is something done by an
individual not done to him, and since 2008 five percent figured it out. To excuse these “young men” and pass the
blame on to policymakers and leaders is placing the burden of fixing the
problem in the wrong place – typical of responsibility issues. To achieve his aims this CEO should instead
take the approach that Bill Cosby has taken for years, challenging the parents
and children to work hard and succeed, and not accept such excuses.
*Calculations:
Average popcorn consumption = 52 quarts per year. That’s one per week. Popcorn eaten at home = 70%. Uncooked sales for home use = 90%. Therefore cooked and eaten at home = 70% x
90% = 63%, 63% x one quart (bag) per week = 63%. 14 bags per week / 63% = 22.2 – and that’s
not all microwave.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment