In a widely circulated article from the Guardian
newspaper, the news from Australia is that it does not. The headline reads: “Homeopathy not effective
for treating any condition, Australian report finds.” After a thorough and extensive review of over
200 research papers on the subject, the National Health and Medical Research
Council (NHMRC) states: “there are no
health conditions for which there is reliable evidence that homeopathy is
effective.”
They go on to warn that people who use homeopathic
medicine as an excuse to delay or avoid professional medical help may be
putting their lives at risk.
What is homeopathy?
The article describes it as the belief “that illness-causing substances
can, in minute doses, treat people who are unwell,” and by diluting them in
water or alcohol, “the resulting mixture retains a ‘memory’ of the original
substance that triggers a healing response in the body.” That is the theory.
Wikipedia defines it as “a system of alternative medicine
created in 1796 by Samuel Hahnemann based on his doctrine of like cures like,
whereby a substance that causes the symptoms of a disease in healthy people
will cure similar symptoms in sick people.”
The fact that it is not effective is certainly not news as
the first paragraph of Wikipedia entry immediately goes on to say: “Homeopathy is considered a pseudoscience. It
is not effective for any condition, and no remedy has been proven to be more
effective than placebo.” References
associated with this conclusion date back to 2000 and earlier. It was known for a long time, but the fact
that any government agency has come out so strongly against it is new.
The industry has a different take. The National Center for Homeopathy tells
us: “Homeopathy is a safe, gentle, and
natural system of healing that works with your body to relieve symptoms,
restore itself, and improve your overall health.” “It is extremely safe to use, even with very
small children and pets, has none of the side effects of many traditional
medications, is very affordable, is made from natural substances, and is FDA
regulated.”
One British source sees it differently. After an extensive explanation of the theory
behind it they describe it as being rooted in superstition, ritual and sympathetic
magic; and cite a comprehensive study from 2005 showing that it is
ineffective. For the theory to be true “we
would have to toss out practically everything we have learned over the past two
centuries about biology, pharmacology, mathematics, chemistry and physics.”
It seems many people disagree with the industry portrayal. Many studies have shown it as ineffective,
but what about the claims of safety and regulation? The US Government’s National Center for
Complementary and Alternative Health is not complimentary on the subject. “We have a fair amount of research on
homeopathic medicine for a variety of conditions, but less evidence on its
safety, particularly for over-the-counter products.” The FDA does regulate it as a class of drugs,
but “doesn’t evaluate these products for safety or effectiveness” and “some
contain ingredients or contaminants in amounts that could cause side effects,
drug interactions, or other safety concerns.”
Since those potential contaminants are so diluted, sometimes
to beyond the point of detection, homeopathic medicine is probably safe but
ineffective. The worst that can
happen is for people to rely on homeopathy to the exclusion of professional
medical help, especially if they avoid vaccinations.
So what’s the big deal?
It’s just people again throwing away money on a product that has been
known for years to be ineffective. But
when a company gets you to pay money for something that doesn’t work, how can
that be legal? Doesn’t the government
also have a consumer protection division to protect us from our own
foolishness, like credit card scams, payday loans and fraudulent vacation
schemes? Out of curiosity I asked,
“Where does the government’s Consumer Protection Agency stand on all of
this?”
Their website lists under the heading “Current Scams That
You Should Be Aware Of” the following categories: Benefits and Grants, Business, Cars, Citizenship
and Immigration, Computers and Internet, Family, Home, and Community, Health
and Nutrition, International Relations, Jobs and Education, Money, and Travel
and Recreation. A closer look at the
Health and Nutrition link shows no mention of homeopathy (but there are a large
number of other very interesting topics where Americans have been sold
worthless or dangerous products). Until
there are enough complaints on this topic, I guess we are on our own.
The government can’t (or won’t) protect us from sellers of
every product or service that takes our money and give us only promises in
return. Again critical thinking and just
a little research can eliminate a lot of wasted time and money and possibly
keep us safer.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment