Movies are very popular.
Americans spent over $10 billion going to the movies in each of the past
6 years. Most of the movies shown are
fiction, made-up stories to try to capture our attention and imagination. Even those movies that play to the popular
sentiment, making big businesses and Wall Street the villains, are made by big
business and promoted in a way to get us to part with our money for a couple of
hours of entertainment.
As we sit in the theater mesmerized by the celebrities,
special effects and other flickering lights on the screen, we tend to lose the
perspective that it’s just a story – often pushing a viewpoint. Some problems begin when we take the
information and situations shown on the screen as fact, or as reflecting real
life. Documentary movies compound this
problem by presenting only the facts that support a preconceived position, not
giving the balanced viewpoint, apparently afraid to investigate too deeply for
fear of being forced to give up their dearly held image of how the world
works. It would deprive them of the
opportunity to make money and influence us to side with them by scaring us with these slanted views.
Back in 2004 Morgan Spurlock, an independent filmmaker,
released his documentary movie, Super Size
Me, which followed him on a 30-day exploration of the fast food industry to
show how they use wily advertising to profit from encouraging poor nutrition
and unhealthy habits. A couple of years
ago I posted a link to a video showing how a high school science teacher
challenged his students to develop a healthy diet for him based purely on the
menu from McDonald’s with varied meals and an eye toward total calories and
fats. After eating three meals everyday from MacDonald’s and beginning an
exercise program where he walked for 45 minutes a day, he lost 37 pounds and
his cholesterol dropped from 249 to 170.
Although it was rightly categorized as a documentary, this Super Size Me filmmaker
clearly had an agenda and was appealing to an audience with similar feelings.
In 2014 comes another documentary. This one, called Fed Up, has the objective of
telling us how sugar is responsible for the worldwide obesity epidemic and how
it is endangering our children. Notice
the common thread of blaming big business for tricking us while the government sits
idly by. Both try to scare us with a
danger that is out of our control, giving us only facts and expert opinions
that conform to their strongly held position in what is referred to as the
health movement.
A long essay on the Science Based Medicine website specifically
disputes many of the facts presented in this movie and points out the
prejudices of the selected experts that appear in it. The article concludes: “The film’s thesis, that sugar has caused the
obesity epidemic, is not well supported by evidence. It is a partial truth that
the filmmakers have dogmatically represented as the whole truth, with nary a
hint of nuance.” They praise it for raising
awareness of childhood obesity, but that it unfortunately does so through
misrepresentation, hype and biased opinions “in support of the filmmakers’
political agenda of increasing food regulation.”
Don’t totally blame documentary films. Network news does the same thing by deciding what to
show and what to omit. They show over
and over a picture of a toddler drowned in the sea off Turkey and then days
later marvel at the shift in public opinion on the refugee issue in Europe sparked
by that single image. When we stop
thinking and start reacting, they rejoice.
Americans are outraged by the dentist who killed a lion in Africa
and sneer at a Kentucky County Clerk as a narrow-minded hater, but proudly wear
t-shirts celebrating Che Guevara as a counter-culture hero and
anti-establishment icon, apparently unaware of his history as a mass murderer
and inventor of Cuban slave labor camps.
They probably saw him as the hero of a 2008 movie that, according to the
New York Times, “cagily evades Che's ugly side, notably his increasing
commitment to violence and seemingly endless war, but the movie is without
question political—even if it emphasizes romantic adventure over
realpolitik—because, like all films, it is predicated on getting, spending and
making money.”
When a woman disagrees with the politics of others and
refuses to issue wedding licenses, she ends up in jail. When a man disagrees with the politics of
others and has them summarily executed, he ends up as the hero of a movie and on
a t-shirt. Interesting.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment