Americans seem to be able to complain about almost
anything. In 1975 when inflation was out
of control, Congress decided that instead of trying to adjust Social Security
to meet each new increase, they would pass a law providing a Cost of Living
Adjustment (COLA) to be calculated each year in the fall for implementation at
the New Year. Prices, as tracked by one consumer
price index (CPI-W), would be the benchmark.
If prices went up from year to year, Social Security would be increased
according to a set formula. If they went
down or stayed the same, there would be no change. That seems simple enough – and generous,
considering there would only be an increase or no change but never a cut.
This Fox News article, which is almost identical to a CNN article released the same day, begins: “For
just the third time in 40 years, millions of Social Security recipients,
disabled veterans and federal retirees can expect no increase in benefits next
year.” The reason of course is that
prices did not go up; the CPI-W will be flat or even down from last year. The culprit, if there is blame to be
assigned, is a drop in gasoline prices.
No inflation means no raise.
They go on to tell how terrible this is going to be for
seniors and others who depend on Social Security. Some complain that the CPI-W reflects the
spending of younger workers and is not representative of the spending of older
adults or other Social Security recipients.
The reduction in gasoline will not offset the increase in medical costs,
which are usually more of an issue for all Social Security recipients. One advocacy group wants the designated CPI
changed, but oil prices have come down so far this time that it would probably not make any difference.
On top of that many people have Medicare premiums deducted
from their Social Security checks and depend on that annual increase to pay for
the any increase in Medicare premiums. “When
that doesn't happen, a long-standing federal ‘hold harmless’ law protects the
majority [about 70%] of beneficiaries from having their Social Security payments
reduced,” and many of the rest are the high-income folks. Still, that leaves not a lot to gripe about.
Of course, social media is abuzz. Republicans want to blame it on Obama (since
the only two other times this has happened were 2010 and 2011). Democrats imply that inaction by the Republican
Congress is to blame. A favorite
whipping boy, big oil gets blamed because it’s mainly the fault of lower gas
prices (how crazy is that?)!
Get a grip! It’s a
formula, not dependent on a policy change or new law. Lower gas prices are a good thing affecting
the price of food, clothing and everything else that’s moved by truck or train.
The formula didn’t provide an increase
this time, but inflation is not a smooth line and it’s likely the drop this year
leaves more room for an increase sometime in the future. Furthermore, Social Security was never
intended to be the sole source of income for retirees.
In true news media fashion though, this article and the CNN article
and several more came out two full days before the final announcement in an
obvious attempt to get everyone in a panic as soon as possible. Expectations of getting an increase (no
matter what) have been set. Instead of complaining, most
retirees should remember 1975 when inflation was out of control and mortgage
interest was near 10%. But we aren’t
grateful for the lack of inflation; we are too busy complaining about no annual increase for those of us on a fixed (?) income!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment