It seems that when faced with information they tend to agree
with, news reporters become very sloppy or lazy.
They just lead the interviewee along allowing him or her to make the
points, without asking questions to clarify the situation.
This was evident during one interview, as the CBS This Morning team were faced with a study from Consumer Reports about how using antibiotics in animals was harming the food supply.
The point being made was a good one. Overuse of antibiotics has allowed bacteria
to evolve leading to “superbugs” including MRSA and other resistant
strains. “At least 2 million
Americans fall victim to antibiotic-resistant infections every year;
23,000 die.” When antibiotics are
needlessly used in healthy animals to promote growth, it merely “teases” the bacteria
to mutate into more resistant varieties and these bacteria are passed along to
consumers when they eat the infected meat and poultry. This makes it more difficult to treat people
who get sick. Good farming practices
mean using the drugs only for sick animals and good hygiene for the rest.
They showed a table with the results of the food they tested, comparing the amount found with superbugs.
Here is a basic reproduction.
Conventionally
Grown
|
w/o Antibiotics
|
|
Shrimp
|
17%
|
3%
|
Ground Beef
|
18%
|
9%
|
Chicken
|
69%
|
59%
|
Turkey
|
83%
|
80%
|
One host asked, “How do you label against this?” That was followed by another graphic with an
explanation. They concluded with a
comment that you don’t have to give up meat, but just be careful where you buy
it. The representative from Consumer
Reports added, “And make sure you cook it thoroughly."
Yes, we want better and safer farming practices. We want animals (as well as humans) being given antibiotics only when necessary.
But we are left with the impression that the “non-sustainable” farming
in conjunction with the restaurants and grocery stores that are less careful about their sources are the big culprits in this superbug problem.
Look again at the table above. No one asked why the difference in chicken
and turkey seemed much less significant, and what would explain any superbugs at all in
the “without antibiotics” category.
Furthermore, no one asked how many of the 23,000 deaths are
attributed to this problem. In the
Consumer Reports article it says, “calculations using data from the CDC show
that about 20 percent of people sickened by an antibiotic-resistant bug
don’t pick it up in the hospital or from another person—they get it from their
food.” So we are talking about only 20% of
the problem! That information was never
clear in the interview. In fact it was implied that the 23,000 deaths can be attributed to those poorly managed farms who didn’t observe “sustainable” practices.
Finally, the comment about thoroughly cooking the meat ended
the segment. Would anyone venture to say
how important this is in the overall problem of foodborne illnesses in general, and to this superbug issues specifically?
That might be important information, except once they heard what they wanted
to hear it was time to move on to more important news (like interviewing
some celebrity).
Can we trust the news media to deliver the whole story? At the very least we need to keep a very close
eye on them.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment