From time to time when I’m driving my car and searching the
various radio stations for some entertainment, I come across an ad telling me
that American men are not as macho as they used to be. It seems, according to them, that the average
amount of testosterone has been decreasing from generation to generation resulting in the crisis they label as low-T.
It behooves me, according to them, to point my car to the nearest clinic
to be tested to make sure I, too, am not a victim of this dreaded condition.
If I fail the blood test, they will give me the shots I need
to make me feel like my old self, with a better mood, more energy, firmer
waistline and more desire. Since almost no one feels as good as when they
were younger, it sounds like another scientific miracle.
Do I turn my car around immediately and head to one of the
clinics? That’s not what a critical
thinker does, especially when that critical thinker has learned to be very
suspicious of these kinds of come-ons.
So I wasn’t surprised when I learned earlier this week that
six of those companies were being sued in Illinois Federal Court for “inappropriate
marketing of testosterone-replacement therapy (TRT) with misleading claims.” The complaint continues that the companies
have widely marketed the therapy for off-label use for “a condition invented by
Defendants and referred to as Low-T.” Furthermore,
TRT offers little or no benefit while posing serious health risks with no
warning to patients.
There is a real medical condition called hypogonadism, not called
Low-T. The Mayo Clinic has information
about diagnosis: “If
tests confirm you have low testosterone, further testing can determine if a
testicular disorder or a pituitary abnormality is the cause. Based on specific
signs and symptoms, additional studies can pinpoint the cause.” Seems it’s not the direct route to virility
the radio ad makes it sound like. That should be a surprise to no one.
On a completely unrelated subject, except that I have also
wondered about this when driving in the car – if you look up the butterfly effect, not the book or the movie, the definition looks like this.
“The butterfly effect is a term used in chaos theory to
describe how small changes to a seemingly unrelated thing or condition (also
known as an initial condition) can affect large, complex systems. The term
comes from the suggestion that the flapping of a butterfly's wings in South
America could affect the weather in Texas, meaning that the tiniest influence
on one part of a system can have a huge effect on another part.”
So if theoretically the flapping of the wings of one
butterfly can affect the weather, what is the effect, if any, of the estimated
300,000 wind turbines around the world harvesting wind power to generate
electricity? We see them along the road
and think “clean energy,” but is it more like “lots of huge butterfly wings”?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment