That’s the law in California since July of last year. If the
kids are not current with the required vaccinations, they do not get to attend
public schools.
Is this an attack on our freedom? Is this the nanny state overruling decisions
that should belong to parents? I don’t
think so - and I’m an advocate of freedom.
Upon signing the bill into law the governor released a statement saying, "The science is clear that
vaccines dramatically protect against a number of infectious and dangerous
diseases. While it's true that no
medical intervention is without risk, the evidence shows that immunization powerfully
benefits and protects the community.”
This is absolutely true, yet people continue to fear vaccinating their
kids based on fraudulent science by a British doctor who wanted to show a
relationship between vaccinations and autism so badly that he falsified results to reach
that conclusion.
Wikipedia gives a good summary of the
history. “Andrew Jeremy Wakefield (born
1957, Eton, England) is a British former
gastroenterologist and medical researcher who was struck off the UK medical register for his fraudulent 1998 research paper and other misconduct in support of
the now-discredited claim that there
was a link between the administration of the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR)
vaccine, and the appearance of autism and bowel disease.” [Emphasis
added.] The next two paragraphs of the article give more information about financial conflicts of interest, ethical problems and
withdrawal of support by reputable organizations.
The New York Times archives for Wakefield contains many
telling entries including: “Anti-vaccine
film pulled from Tribeca Festival; A measles outbreak in Britain would never
have occurred if parents had respected the proven safety record of vaccine; Autism
Fraud and Why some still won’t accept that Andrew Wakefield is wrong.”
Yet an NBC report not too many weeks ago was headlined: “Vaccine Skeptic Message Gets Bolder,” and going on to say, “The skeptics have taken on a brasher,
bolder tone in recent months.” Once only
demanding safer vaccines, “an increasing number now say most or all vaccines
are dangerous, and some accuse the federal government, physicians and the
mainstream media of colluding with drug companies to deliberately poison
children using vaccines.” Do they
believe that saying it longer and louder will make their arguments true? This is behavior that was once associated with crazy
people.
Do they trust information from a
discredited former doctor, celebrities with no medical training and a Facebook
support group over that from medical experts?
Do they think raising the ante from unsafe vaccines to intentionally
poisoning children to line corporate pockets will make a faulty argument more
powerful? Apparently so.
But these people in their naïve acceptance of a scientific
fraud are putting everyone else’s children at risk. One or two kids in a classroom of vaccinated
children may not be a problem. Who are
they going to catch the diseases from if everyone else is vaccinated? But as the number grows so does the possibility
of an outbreak – vaccines are not one hundred percent effective.
This is not an issue of freedom, so much as one of responsibility
and critical thinking. From dangerous
behavior comes potentially fatal consequences, and unfortunately, at some point
the authorities are forced to step in.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment