We start with a CNBC story about a new miracle product
advertised to help people achieve optimal human performance – whatever that
is. A reader sent me an email with the
subject line “If only people read your blog” along with the link to that story.
The headline reads: “This
start-up raised millions to sell 'brain hacking' pills, but its own study found
coffee works better.” So what do
conscientious business people do when their own study shows that pills they are
selling for $40 a bottle are “less effective in many ways than a cup of coffee”?
They try to “delay publication of the
study and asked researchers to change the name of the product [studied] to
distance it from the analysis.”
The company claims their “supplements such as chewable
caffeine pills help the human system become ‘quantified, optimized, and
upgraded’…and that they may unlock the ‘next-level thinking’ that will be key
to humanity's evolution.” Pay no
attention to that pesky research comparing it unfavorably to coffee or to the
general lack of scientific evidence backing their claims. The news report concludes with information
that one month after receiving the results of the study, they changed the
company name and hired a scientist, as neither co-founder “has a scientific
background.”
Of course these products are marketed as dietary supplements to sidestep FDA regulations. They are
therefore only subject to investigation after problems are reported. Problems may include illness, injury or major
physical side effects; the financial side effects of tossing away $40 for a
bottle of chewable caffeine pills are left to the individual. (For a more in-depth discussion of the
problems with nutritional supplements in general, see my comments here, here
and here.)
What is frightening is that they are selling millions of dollars of these products to people who should know better. (But that’s a drop in the bucket compared to the revenue generated by the supplement industry as a whole.) P. T. Barnum was right!
And speaking of people knowing better – after much legal
foot-dragging, stalling and negotiating by the defendants, a Federal Judge has
ordered tobacco companies who lied to the American public about the dangers of
cigarette smoking to take corrective action.
They are forbidden to use any health descriptors including "the words ‘low
tar,’ ‘light,’ ‘ultra light,’ ‘mild,’ ‘natural,’ and any other words which
reasonably could be expected to result in a consumer believing that smoking the
cigarette brand using that descriptor may result in a lower risk.” In addition, they’ve been ordered to
undertake a broad campaign, advertising the dangers of smoking including:
website postings, labels on cigarette packages, and newspaper and television ads.
That’s all fine, but a few weeks ago I was out with my
granddaughter on the day after my birthday.
She asked how old I was now. When
I told her, she said, “It’s a good thing you didn’t smoke or you would be dead already.” So if a five-year-old can
figure it out and express it that clearly, I think it’s more a matter of
motivation than information for teens and adults.
A little critical thinking and paying attention goes a long
way to making us healthier and wealthier.
Isn’t it worth a try?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment