Yes, life is like a crossword puzzle, and here’s why.
This thought came to me when I was finishing up a Sunday NY
Times puzzle left on my clipboard since March. The
clue was 5 letters long “Not be able to sleep.”
At first I put in SITUP. That
seemed to fit as I filled in the down letters.
The UP was definitely right, but I later found I needed an L at the
beginning instead of an S. So my answer
now read LITUP. That made as much sense
as the NYT answers often do so I left it and worked on the rest. When I came back no letter I tried at the
beginning of the down answer that cut right through the middle of this LITUP
made any sense. Then it struck me. It was LIEUP, and everything else fit!
“So what?” you say.
How is that like life? Well, I
committed to one answer, and then got more evidence and had to change it. Then I had to change that second answer to finally
succeed. the final answer made more sense, but the point is I wrote in the
letters (in pencil), but I couldn’t get too attached to those answers, even
though they were “my” answers and I thought they were right at the time. Being flexible is a
healthier way to live.
Too often people think they have the right answer, but
instead of being flexible when faced with contradictory evidence or opinions,
they try to ignore them or block them out.
When a controversial speaker comes to a campus, students and faculty may
put pressure on the administration to withdraw the invitation. We hear examples of this at each graduation
cycle. If that tactic fails, agitators
may show up at the venue with the intention of shouting down the presentation. This deprives everyone else of information
they might want to hear - even if it’s wrong, it gives them something to think
about.
It’s not just college students. This story from The Guardian shows that
scientists, those who are supposed to be objective and open to new evidence, act in the same way. Around 1960 a scientist
proposed that sugar was the culprit in the modern diet. Those in the camp that proposed fat as the
problem, did not want to hear it. Using
the power of personality and political influence, “prominent nutritionists
combined with the food industry to destroy his reputation, and his career never
recovered.” They didn’t want to debate,
they wanted to bury any opposition. The
government issued dietary guidelines based on those (fat) theories and no one ever
looked back.
Last September, even though ideas about the harmfulness of
sugar have become mainstream, the author of a book pointing out problems
with the development of current dietary guidelines found an article she wrote
for a medical journal attacked. “The
response of the nutrition establishment was ferocious: 173 scientists…signed a
letter demanding [the journal] retract the piece.” They offered no counter arguments and some
who signed the letter had not even read the article. They just didn’t want to hear it! (This is a great article but rather long.)
This kind of refusal to consider alternatives is everywhere,
even among those who call on everyone else to be open-minded. (They often want us to be open-minded only
about what they believe in, feeling no discomfort over the apparent
inconsistency of silencing those who don’t agree with them.) People only want to hear more evidence no
matter how scanty to support their concept of the truth. Recently House Speaker Paul Ryan referred to
this phenomenon as “an echo chamber.” Stephen
Prothero, whom I judge from reading his most recent book to be in the opposite
camp politically from Ryan, also criticizes it as “a hall of mirrors.” I wrote about it in December under the title “Confirmation Bias.”
Whether the subject is dietary guidelines, farming
practices, climate change, health advice, economic policy, or a host of other
topics, no one wants to hear the other side of the story. They would rather shut down the opposition
than reconsider the subject or be forced to defend a position they hold so
dearly. In their minds it’s settled! Whatever happens, no one wants to take out
their eraser, even if it means possibly being successful.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment