I received an email with several embedded links and the
conclusion: “It is interesting that
longer and deeper thinking tends to lead people to more compassionate and
tolerant approaches.” I dug deeper and began
to think that ideas like this that we take for granted are not so simple.
The words compassion
and tolerance have become very
popular. At least a couple research organizations are on a campaign to convince as many as possible that these two
mental attitudes will combine to yield a more successful future for the
world. We need more, and mindfulness
training for adults and children may be the key.
I am inclined to ask:
How do we measure compassion and tolerance, and more important, what are
they?
Whenever I see words like more or better, I believe some
measurement must be involved. Finding
metrics for mental activity can be deceptive. Self-reporting is always suspect. One way to identify compassion is to observe
some behavior and label it compassionate, but such classification is impossible
without a clear definition. Someone must
define what behaviors demonstrate compassion. How do we know it when we see it? As researchers report more positive brain
scans on compassionate people, they still must have a definition that distinguishes
compassion from other traits. The same
goes for tolerance.
The Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education
operating at Stanford says, “Compassion unfolds in response to suffering,”
recognizing it, feeling empathy and concern, which “motivates us to take
action, and help relieve that suffering.”
They promote compassion by saying, “With compassion, our empathy for the
suffering of others can give rise to altruism – bringing immediate and
long-term happiness and tranquillity [sic] to our lives.” (But technically, if we are motivated to do
it by the good feelings it gives us, that’s hardly altruism.) A simple dictionary definition of compassion is
concern for the suffering of others.
But, since no one can go into people’s head and actually see it, they must
infer this concern from observing behavior – she did or said this or that,
therefore, she is compassionate. Then they
can observe and classify the brain scans.
But here’s where it gets tricky. When others are suffering, is it always wise
or proper to step in and “take action, and help relieve that suffering”? Is that always the best solution? Sometimes suffering is the result of bad luck
or natural disaster or birth defect, but sometimes suffering is the direct
result of the action or inaction of the individual.
Behavior has consequences.
The purpose of those consequences is to encourage or discourage similar
behavior. In bowling, the feedback comes
from the number of pins knocked down. If
you get a strike, try to do the same thing again. If you get a gutter ball, make a change. A coach can work with the bowler on technique
and equipment as long as the bowler is dedicated to improving. If the bowler is not interested and expects
the coach to do the bowling for him, the consequences have failed; any lesson
is lost. If the bowler decides on a
course of action that results in him being unable to roll the ball, no coaching
will help.
Likewise in life, immoderate compassion, the taking action
to relieve the suffering when the suffering is self-inflicted, crosses the line
from aiding to enabling. Yet so many
people are motivated by that “happiness and tranquility” that it brings to our
lives and fail to see the long term damage it does to others and to society.
Parents who give in to a child’s every desire or step in to
solve every problem are not being compassionate, even as they believe they are recognizing
suffering and taking action to relieve it.
They are robbing the child of valuable lessons on how to survive as an unselfish,
responsible grownup. Likewise a society
that steps in to assist all adults who appear to be suffering regardless of the
source of the suffering are, in some cases, negating the consequences (lessons)
of poor decisions, encouraging a continuation of that behavior and possibly
contaminating others.
Bad things happen when we get carried away by our emotions
and our caring but are still rewarded by those feelings of happiness and
tranquility. It’s called unintended
consequences. Compassion requires care as well as caring.
And what of tolerance:
The willingness to tolerate opinions or behaviors one does not
necessarily agree with? This too is
difficult and will be taken up next time.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment