I noticed in passing a sense of panic among a number of
people over the proposed GOP tax reform plan.
I went on line to try to find the source of the information and found
articles from January and April of this year and from August 2016 (based on
campaign promises), but nothing about a current proposed plan. I finally tracked down the source of the
information, a local newsletter with no references cited.
The newsletter was consistent with those older sources,
warning of the loss of itemized deductions and personal exemptions as the
standard deduction is raised to $24,000 from the 2016 level of $12,600. The tone was the same. Loss of those deductions (medical expenses,
state income and property taxes, home mortgage interest, gifts to charity,
casualty and theft losses, and some job expenses) would be a hardship on the
middle class. This got me thinking about
taxes and deductions.
Several references told me that 45% of households pay no income taxes at all. These are typically those
who don’t earn enough (not the rich using loopholes). Their attitude should be, “Reform away; we
don’t care!”
Another source tells that only about 30% of filers use the
itemized deduction. That means that only
about one in six households has any stake in the outcome of this debate. And most of those are in the upper income
range. As this graph shows the 30%
average becomes 60% for those above 75k, almost 80% for those in the 100k to 200k
earnings range and almost 95% for those households making over 200k per year. The number who shouldn’t care increases to 5
out of 6.
Next let’s look again at itemized deductions vs. the
standard deduction for a sample lower income family. Remember, itemizing only starts to matter
once you hit the standard deduction, because that is what you get anyway
without doing anything or keeping any records.
On top of that, medical expenses don’t count until you have spent 10% of
income.
For a household making $68,000 per year, approximately 20% above average, under the old plan they would subtract $12,600 and $4050 for each
exemption (use $12,150 assuming a family of 3) and pay 15% of the remaining $43,250. Under the new plan they would subtract
$24,000 and pay at only 12% of the remaining $44,000. How high would
their itemized deductions have to be under today’s system to pay the same amount?
Surprisingly the answer is $32,800 (plus $6,800 more if the
medical bills are used to qualify) in itemized deductions!
That’s an unusually high number of deductions for a fairly modest income. It’s logical to conclude that any low to
middle income family hurt by this would be a rare exception.
So what we are left with is speculation on what the proposal
would look like and typical exaggeration about how many it would hurt and how
severely. From this cursory overview it
seems the ones who would be most affected are those
who buy big, expensive houses or who give to charity as a tax strategy
rather than out of generosity or those unfortunates with very high medical
expenses.
The problem is that I doubt anyone will look at it even this
thoroughly. Instead the parties will
fight back and forth expressing shock and outrage (more outrage!) at the “rhetoric”
of the other side.
Think of how easy it would be for someone to post a simple
spreadsheet form on line and let each family calculate the difference between
any new proposal and the current system.
This way after filling in a few numbers, everyone would know
approximately where they stood without the breathless hyperbole and political spin. Does anyone want to bet we see this kind of critical
thinking scenario instead of the usual anxious generalizations about hurting the middle class or favoring the rich?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment