I saw the news on TV that a popular infant formula was
being recalled. Several websites followed
up: “Sammy's Milk baby food has been
recalled due to the possibility that bacteria may be present in the
formula. Graceleigh, Inc. recalled the baby food over the bacteria Cronobacter. The bacteria can
cause severe and sometimes fatal blood infections or meningitis in infants.”
Normally I would not take notice, but they showed a picture
of the container and I was struck by all the “magic” words on the label. My
impression was that they were trying to lure well-intentioned mothers into
buying this brand as a noble and loving act, demanding only the best for their
baby, while probably overspending for minimal benefits. Some research was in order.
The first trigger word on the label was non-GMO: What does that mean? A retired farmer and third-year graduate
student in molecular and cellular biology at Dartmouth College has a lot to say
about it in this Forbes article. “Today,
U.S. dairy farms need only 8.5 million cows to produce more than twice as much
milk as dairy farms did in 1940 with 26 million cows. Crops developed through
genetic engineering have played a role in that progress. Contrary to the claims
of those whose ideology opposes scientific progress, the consumption of plants
developed by genetic engineering have no negative effect on milk quality or
safety.” He later concludes, “the claim
that ‘GMOs are in your milk’ is false – there are no plant genes of any kind in
any milk, just some fragments of DNA.”
Next is the guarantee of it being gluten-free. Is there usually gluten in milk? “Other than the gluten-containing grains, all
other unprocessed, whole foods are gluten-free. According to MayoClinic.com,
milk is one of these gluten-free, whole foods. Non-fat, low-fat, whole milk and
cream are gluten-free, as long as they're unflavored, plain, white milk.”
So far they don’t really have to do anything special to make
the first two claims.
Next on the top banner is a comment about Omega Ratio, but a
healthy omega ratio is still a matter of debate. I doubt one in a hundred new mothers even
knows what it is, but it sure sounds healthy and reassuring!
Below the brand it says “pediatrician recommended,” but it
doesn’t say how many and endorsements are not evidence. I do remember this fact from my entry here back in July: “According to this article in
The Pediatric Journal, “there are no data supporting the presumed health
benefits” of a gluten-free diet. “Gluten-free packaged foods frequently
contain a greater density of fat and sugar than their gluten-containing
counterparts, which can lead to problems for children such as obesity and
new-onset insulin resistance.”
“Furthermore, a gluten-free diet for children can delay a
real diagnosis of celiac disease, which has been linked to anemia,
osteoporosis, diabetes, autoimmune thyroid disease and intestinal cancers.” But since milk doesn’t ordinarily contain
gluten, it’s a moot point – except that, again, mothers should be wary of, rather than
drawn to such a label.
Below that it says “DHA & prebiotic blend for brain, eye
and immune system development." It’s hard
to find information on this that is not advertising, but one reference
describes a study showing DHA supporting
immune systems in healthy children, not necessarily development. WebMD tells us that DHA, an Omega-3 fatty
acid is “thought to be important to
the development of infants, particularly as regards their eyes and brain. DHA may improve vision and some cognitive
functions in infants and toddlers” [emphasis added]. None of this is as definitive as the label
makes it sound.
Finally, comes the cost of all these goodies. The details on Sammy’s website promise 20
servings per container for $29.95. Let’s
call it $1.50 per serving. Similar
formula in my local grocery store, which is also gluten-free and non-GMO and
contains DHA, sells in packages 80% larger for about half the price. That’s about 40 cents per serving for
substantially the same thing.
So you can pay about four times as much for the luxury brand
that touts itself as supposedly the very healthiest option and feel good about
doing the loving, caring thing, but at a cost of more than a dollar a feeding.
I have absolutely no experience with baby formula, but when
I see the obvious come-on words, trigger words, for that or any other product, I
immediately get suspicious. It would be
smart for more people to do so. Marketers
of all goods are not interested in educating us, just selling us their
product. And the easier it is to play on
emotions of pride, guilt or anxiety, the more they can get away with. In the battle to protect ourselves against
such manipulation, critical thinking is key.
By the way, the FDA also mentions that the recalled baby
food “may also not provide a sufficient level of iron.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment