As another school year has begun, I saw in a
syndicated advice column called Living With Children a question that addresses
the idea of parental responsibility and school homework. I had mixed reactions.
The letter writer, the parent of a child entering the first
grade, says that they were notified that the local school expects all parents to
check a website, called the Parent Portal, every night to keep up with their
children’s homework assignments and to help them when they get stuck. This parent doesn’t like the idea, feeling
that “in effect, we are being made responsible for what, in our estimation, is
a teacher’s responsibility.” Other
parents agree.
The columnist also agrees, arguing that such websites take
advantage of parental anxiety based on an erroneous belief that
“children’s grades reflect the quality of their parenting.” He worries that these setups will turn
parents into “micromanaging enablers” by transferring “a significant amount of
responsibility for academic instruction to the home.” The column continues that enabling in any
form shifts responsibility off the children (and possibly the teachers)
producing over the long term less mature and effective adults.
The final advice is to not check every
night but to help occasionally, letting the “children know that they are
responsible for their homework and that there will be consequences should they require
[their parents] to get involved."
My mixed feelings arose from the columnist letting the
parents too much off the hook. The
writer seems to want to ignore the website, which was probably too aggressively pushed
on them; but this website could also be seen as a tool. Should those parents wait around as in
pre-Internet days for a teacher’s conference to find out their child is lagging
behind or not doing assignments as expected?
With this modern tool, parents can spot check what is expected and
reinforce those expectations without becoming overly involved. When parents ask, “Do you have any homework?” and are met with the shrug or the vague answer, they have a tool to fall back
on to find the answer. Reinforcing
expectations or answering questions is not enabling. Nagging constantly and checking answers before
they are turned in is.
I also don’t buy the idea that parental involvement has no
impact on student performance. In their book,
The Why Axis, Gneezy and List studied
the effect of motivation and incentives on student performance. They
tried different incentive programs with students, parents and teachers in
Chicago Heights public schools and found that when the incentives were properly
designed, the minority students performed just as well as their suburban
counterparts in rich, white neighborhoods. All three
parties: students, parents and teachers,
must be motivated and involved.
It’s true enabling weakens – if only Washington could figure
that out – but parents should not use the fear of enabling as an excuse to drop
the ball or pass all the responsibility back to the teachers. This lack of parental involvement is one reason more and more decisions about our schools are moving away from the local level toward state capitals and
Washington.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment