Driverless vehicles: Almost 4 years ago I asked the question, “What
could lie ahead in the case of self-driving cars?” I suggested driverless 18-wheelers moving
freight from warehouses to stores, trash trucks with automatic lifts to both
collect and drive the route, a robot to deliver mail from an autonomous vehicle sorting and filling the boxes, taxis
with a touchpad to enter destination but no driver and even safer school buses with CCTV to
take attendance and keep an eye on the children.
Today we have heard much about testing driverless trucks. This Guardian article tells us the UK government has approved trials of convoys of
semi-automated trucks on their highways.
“Up to three wirelessly connected HGVs will travel in convoy, with
acceleration, braking and steering controlled by the lead vehicle, a concept
named platooning.”
At the same time that Uber is testing self-driving
taxis, in Ann Arbor, MI “Domino’s and Ford are teaming up to see if customers
will warm to the idea of pizza delivered by driverless cars.” It’s all coming true and probably faster than
expected.
On another subject: Many
Americans look to our neighbors to the north to set the example for medical
care, but recently Manitoba, “the only remaining Canadian province that covers
a portion of chiropractic care” has reduced the per visit insurance by about 30
percent and it covers only the manipulation. This according to Dynamic Chiropractic.
Only a few weeks ago I warned about the dangers and
possibilities of fraud concerning chiropractic services. Apparently most Canadian provinces address
these issues by refusing to pay for any of it, letting citizens pay their money
and take their chances.
Low-fat diets: A new
analysis presented at the European Society of Cardiology spanning more than a
decade and considering 135,000 adult subjects from five continents reveals
flaws in government dietary guidelines around the world. “The ongoing Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE)
project has found both saturated and unsaturated fat intake linked to better
heart health, that a high-carb diet is a better predictor of health risks than
fat consumption, and that the health benefits of fruit, vegetables, and legumes
like beans and chickpeas may plateau at three to four servings per day.
The dispute about the dangers of eating fat has been going
on for almost 60 years. Unfortunately,
the political side crowded out the science.
As I put it earlier this year, "With virtually no
evidence that eating less fat had any health benefits, [the authorities]
assumed that 'if a cholesterol-lowering drug could prevent heart attacks, then
a low-fat, cholesterol-lowering diet should do the same.' But the research and the experience over many
years could not confirm this conclusion."
On the subject of homeopathy: Recently,
a couple of negative articles arrived at my desk on this subject. One listed almost fifty warning letters sent by the FDA to makers
of homeopathic products over the last 10 years. “Nearly all ordered the seller to stop
claiming that products could effectively treat specific diseases or conditions.
Some ordered the seller to stop claiming that products were vaccine
equivalents. A few involved the failure to use good manufacturing practices.”
The second revealed that the Russian Academy of Sciences “has
become the latest body to declare homeopathy has ‘no
scientific basis’
and endangers people who believe it to be effective.” I came to pretty much the same conclusion two and a half years ago in “Homeopathy – Does It Really Work?”
I’m sure there are at least several more, but these are the
ones that stood out in my mind or happened to catch my attention. Seeing some of the trends before they become
broadly accepted requires only that one pay attention and try to stay strong in
the five key dimensions.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment