Several years ago I mentioned partially in jest to my
sister, at the time an elementary school teacher, that the stock market was
doomed. With all the safety features
being implemented on playgrounds and other facilities for children, by the time
they reached adulthood they would be too risk averse to want to invest in
anything other than guaranteed accounts.
Farewell, stock market and entrepreneurship.
She immediately set me straight. With padded playgrounds, instead of hanging
upside down by their knees from the monkey bars, they were now hanging by one
leg. Reduce the risk; increase the risk
taking.
That same idea came up again when I began to see the
relationship between automobile safety features and careless driving. And this is not new.
An article from 2006 tells of Researchers
at Purdue, led by a civil engineering professor, that “determined that airbags
and antilock braking systems do not reduce the likelihood of accidents or
injuries because they may encourage more aggressive driving.” The feeling back then was that drivers adapt
to the new technology giving up some responsibility for safety “by becoming
less vigilant.”
By 2012 technology and safety features and enhancements
other than air bags and anti-lock braking systems became more common as they migrated to more cars from the luxury brands. Some of these were vehicle crumple zones, stricter seat belt enforcement, side-impact
protection, traction control, and better conceived speed limits. According to another source, these were “all
designed to save lives and make driving a less risky activity. However, despite
all these safety measures, road accidents and fatalities have remained constant
over the last few decades.”
Traditionally, safety innovations begin at
the luxury level and work their way down, but today some of the autonomous
vehicle research also contributes to the new technology. Today we are beginning to see more backup
cameras, collision mitigation systems, lane departure warning systems, blind-spot
monitors, and drowsiness detection monitors.
Guess what! A July article from Carfax
cites their in-house study finding “that some drivers, especially
younger drivers, may come to over rely on car technology safety features
rather than basic safe driving habits.”
And just a few weeks later in an article principally about
self-driving cars the Seattle Times confirms, “Driver-assist technology that
keeps cars in their lanes, maintains a safe distance from other vehicles, warns
of unseen traffic and slams the brakes to avoid rear-end crashes are rapidly
spreading from luxury cars…But these automated aids aimed at improving safety
are having an unintended consequence: They’re degrading driving skills.” Drivers become lax through over-reliance on newer
and newer technology. Through interviews
they confirmed that most drivers agreed that people tend to quickly become
so comfortable with the technology that they would pay more attention to it
than relying on their own driving skills; for example, listening for the
warning chime instead of looking over their shoulder to check the blind
spot. But, of course as in most
interviews, it’s always the other guy.
Driving is dangerous.
Better cars and better roads can’t totally change that. This adaptation behind the wheel is as
irresponsible as the grade-schoolers hanging upside-down by one leg, except if
they slip they only hurt themselves, not their passengers or others on the
road.
It’s also interesting to suppose where else this tendency to
over-rely on technology may be leading, places where it's not so obvious because
the consequences are subtler, hidden or delayed.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment