“The federal
government announced Wednesday it will eliminate a policy that allowed national
parks like the Grand Canyon to ban the sale of bottled water in an effort to
curb litter.” Fox News explains that the
rules were set up in 2011 because empty bottles scattered throughout some
of the parks had become a major problem.
One problem was the emphasis on bottled water. They did not ban the sale of other beverages,
such as sugary soft drinks that are typically made of sturdier plastic. The policy was obviously not completely
thought through in the first place, setting them up as an easy target for
objections.
Those objections did come and the National Park Service officials
changed their minds. But instead of just
admitting they were wrong or banning the rest of the soft drinks, they said
they wanted to "expand hydration options for recreationalists, hikers, and
other visitors to national parks."
Falling back on the idea of hydration they tried to make it sound like a
health-related decision. There are a
couple of questionable aspects to this.
Later in the article is one sentence that probably gets more
toward the truth: “ The bottled water
and beverage industry have previously lobbied aggressively to keep bottled
water at U.S. national parks.” As in
most cases, follow the money.
But what is all this about hydration? This is one of those urban myths that people
just won’t drop. I even heard someone
talking about pre-hydration the other
day, comparing drinking lots of water (or sports drink) to applying sunscreen
before you go out.
More and more experts are coming
forward with contrary, more balanced advice.
Here is an example. “Drink when
you're thirsty. Stop drinking when your thirst is quenched. Obey that one rule
and there is no risk of dehydration,” says Dr. Stanley Goldfarb, a
University of Pennsylvania kidney specialist.
Later on in that hydration article is a statement that shouldn’t surprise anyone: “Much research on human hydration [is] funded in part by bottled water industry.”
Another study found “no connection between hydration and the
performance of athletes.” It reiterates
the sound, moderate advice to drink when thirsty. There is no need to go overboard or walk
through life tethered to a water bottle.
The final point is about bottled water itself. I have elaborated on this subject in the past. With a few rare exceptions or in emergency
situations, bottled water is typically no purer than tap water and sells at a hundred
times the price. From time to time the
bottled water companies are taken to task by some government agency for
questionable practices or claims. Some
merely use tap water from another location.
Most recently a lawsuit cites Poland Spring Water for deceiving customers
by “bottling common groundwater that doesn’t meet the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's definition
of spring water.”
Lately I’ve noticed in some airports an absence of the usual
drinking fountains outside restrooms.
The only option is to buy the bottles from the vendors. Again, follow the money.
Yes, it is important to have water with you when hiking in a
national park (or anywhere). It is smart
(critical thinking) to buy a water bottle or canteen for the occasion and fill
it at the tap or refill it at a drinking fountain. It is responsible not to throw bottles or any
kind of litter around the trails or campgrounds. It shows perspective to understand that it’s unnecessary
to pre-hydrate or take other extraordinary actions. Drink when you are thirsty; it’s as simple as
that. So many of these problems can be easily
solved by right behavior rather than by government regulations.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Click again on the title to add a comment